WIA Research

Woodbine Subdivision

A plain-English summary of the legal landscape.

When a developer creates a subdivision, they can record restrictions on the land — rules about what you can build, how lots can be used, minimum setbacks, and so on. These restrictions are filed with the county and attach to every lot's deed, binding all future owners automatically. They have nothing to do with any association; any lot owner can enforce them in court. Separately, residents may choose to form a nonprofit — an improvement association, a garden club, whatever — to organize community activities and pool resources. That's a voluntary organization governed by its own bylaws, which bind only its members.

Woodbine has both of these things, and much of the confusion in the neighborhood comes from conflating them. The subdivision has deed restrictions dating to 1946, and residents formed the Woodbine Improvement Association as a nonprofit in 1953. The two are legally independent — but over time, the WIA has presented itself as though it controls the restrictions, calling them "HOA Restrictions" on its website and describing itself as a "Homeowners Association" on state filings since 2008. This site untangles the three key documents, what authority each one actually carries, and what options homeowners have.

Quick Facts

Location
Farmington Hills, MI
Total Homes
140
Subdivision Recorded
1946
Current Dues
$30/year (voluntary)
MRTA Deadline
September 29, 2027

Key Findings

Deed restrictions exist dating to 1946, with a 1976 restatement posted on the WIA website.

Whether the 1976 restatement was ever recorded with Oakland County is unresolved. If not, enforceable restrictions may be limited to the original 1946 language.

The original 1946 restriction text has not been located. It predates the Oakland County Super Index's digital records.

The WIA is a voluntary improvement association, not an HOA. It has no recorded authority to compel dues, place liens, or bind non-members. Since 2008, however, it has described itself as a "Homeowners Association" on its LARA filings — a self-description with no legal effect, but one that creates the appearance of HOA authority.

If the restrictions are enforceable, Michigan case law indicates the "residential purposes only" language would prohibit short-term rentals without any new covenant. (see case law)

A preservation notice must be filed with Oakland County by September 29, 2027, or Michigan's MRTA will permanently extinguish all deed restrictions.

This is the single most time-sensitive issue. Without action, Woodbine loses all covenant enforcement permanently.


How HOA Authority Actually Works

People hear "HOA" and assume it means an organization that automatically has power over your property. But an HOA doesn't get its authority from existing, from calling itself an HOA, or from filing paperwork with the state. Its authority comes from one specific place: recorded deed restrictions that name the association and grant it specific powers.

Here's how it's supposed to work: A developer creates a subdivision and records a document called a Declaration (also called CC&Rs or deed restrictions) with the county. That document attaches to every lot and binds all future owners — it "runs with the land." If the developer wants an HOA to manage the subdivision, the Declaration names that entity and spells out exactly what it can do: collect assessments, place liens, enforce rules. The HOA then files articles of incorporation with the state to establish itself as a legal entity — but the articles alone don't give it power over your property. The recorded Declaration does.

Think of it as a chain: recorded restrictions → name the association → grant it specific powers. If any link in that chain is missing, the association is just a nonprofit corporation — a club. It can collect voluntary dues from its members, organize events, and adopt internal rules. But it cannot compel non-members to pay, place liens on property, or enforce rules against people who never agreed to join.

In Woodbine, that chain is broken at the most fundamental level.

The recorded deed restrictions say nothing about the WIA — they don't name it, don't grant it any powers, and don't mention dues or assessments. The WIA is a voluntary nonprofit that exists alongside the restrictions, not because of them. Everything it claims about mandatory membership and lien authority flows from its own bylaws — a document that has no connection to the land.


Woodbine's Three Documents

With that framework in mind, here are the three documents that govern (or claim to govern) Woodbine — and where the chain of authority breaks down.

This is the only document that binds all homeowners

When a developer divides land into lots, they can record restrictions with the county that apply to every lot. These restrictions travel with the deed — when you buy a home, you're automatically bound by them whether you know it or not. They don't require an association, a vote, or anyone's permission to enforce. Any lot owner can take another lot owner to court over a violation.

Woodbine's restrictions date to 1946 and cover residential-use-only requirements, building minimums, and nuisance rules. They say nothing about dues, assessments, or an association.

Defines the organization — does not bind homeowners

When people form a nonprofit in Michigan, they file a document called "articles of incorporation" with the state. Think of it as the organization's birth certificate and job description combined — it says what the organization exists to do and what powers it has. Anything the organization does later (like adopting bylaws) has to stay within the boundaries the articles set.

The WIA's articles were filed in 1953 to serve "the members of the corporation." They have never been amended in 73 years. They contain no assessment authority, no lien rights, and no mandatory membership. The 2009 bylaws added claims far beyond what the articles authorize.

Internal rules — binds voluntary members only, not homeowners

WIA Bylaws (2009)

Association bylaws

Any organization — a church, a chess club, a neighborhood association — can adopt bylaws to govern how it runs internally: who can vote, how officers are elected, what dues members pay. Bylaws are essentially the club's house rules. They bind the people who chose to join, but they have no power over anyone else.

The WIA's 2009 bylaws were adopted by a vote of roughly 30–40 members. They claim mandatory membership for post-2009 residents and "tax lien" authority for unpaid dues — but bylaws of a voluntary association cannot create obligations that run with the land or bind non-members.


Legal Terms That Matter Here

Mechanisms that can bind property owners

Deed Restrictions (Covenants)

Relevant to Woodbine

Rules recorded with the county that attach to the land and bind all future owners. They don't require consent from each new buyer — the restrictions travel with the deed.

Woodbine: Woodbine has these (dating to 1946). Whether the 1976 restatement is recorded is the key open question.

MRTA Preservation Notice

Relevant to Woodbine

A filing required under Michigan's Marketable Record Title Act to keep covenants older than 40 years alive. Without it, the covenants are permanently extinguished.

Woodbine: Woodbine's restrictions are 80 years old. Deadline: September 29, 2027.

Special Assessment District (SAD)

Relevant to Woodbine

A government-created district where property taxes fund specific improvements (roads, streetlights, landscaping). Assessments are collected by the city — 100% compliance.

Woodbine: A possible path for funding community improvements, though Farmington Hills moved away from SADs in 2018.

Mechanisms NOT in play

Homeowners Association (HOA)

Not applicable

A formal entity — usually established when the subdivision is created — with recorded covenants granting authority to levy mandatory assessments, place liens, and enforce rules against all owners.

Woodbine: Woodbine does not have an HOA. The WIA is a voluntary improvement association. Michigan has no general 'HOA statute' — authority must come from recorded covenants, which Woodbine's lack.

Mandatory Dues / Assessment Authority

Not applicable

The legal power to require all property owners to pay fees, backed by lien authority if they don't. Requires explicit language in recorded covenants.

Woodbine: Woodbine's restrictions contain zero language about dues, assessments, or a common maintenance fund. Under Conlin v. Upton, adding this would require unanimous consent of all 140 owners.

Amendment Provision

Not applicable

A clause in the original covenants allowing owners to add or modify restrictions by majority vote.

Woodbine: Woodbine's Section 8 allows 75% of owners to release (remove) restrictions, but there is no mechanism to add new ones. This distinction is legally decisive.